The impact of tobacco tax implementation on price of tobacco products in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Bahrain
Sophia Delipalla1, Fatimah El-Awa2, Asmus Hammerich2, Anne-Marie Perucic3 and Sophia El-Gohary2
1Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, School of Economics and Regional Studies, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece. 2Universal Health Coverage/Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, WHO Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt (Correspondence to S El-Gohary:
[1] S smuggling and illicit trade; C court and legal challenges; An anti-poor rhetoric and regressivity; R revenue reduction; E employment impact
Abstract
Background: In 2016, the 6 Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries agreed to implement a harmonized excise tax on tobacco products, at a rate of 100% of the pretx price. Saudi Arabia was the first country to implement it.
Aims: To evaluate the impact of implementation of cigarette taxation on consumer prices, affordability and substitution possibilities in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain. To assess the weaknesses of the tax system and discuss how they can be addressed in future reforms.
Methods: We measured progress regarding implementation of the tobacco tax and evaluated its effectiveness. We examined the impact of the excise tax on cigarette pice, price dispersion, and affordability, based on secondary data reported to WHO by the countries concerned.
Results: Saudi Arabia, UAE and Bahrain, which implemented the excise tax in 2017, were faced with sharp increases in cigarette prices and a total tax share > 70% of the final retail price. Affordability and dispersion indices improved, implying that cigarettes became less affordable over time and smokers had fewer opportunities to switch to cheaper brands. The recent introduction of a minimum excise tax was another step in the right direction.
Conclusion: Despite the progress made regarding tobacco tax reform, there is still room for improvement. The tax system has some weaknesses that can easily be addressed in future reforms, otherwise long-term responses by both smokers and the tobacco industry will negate the current progress.
Keywords: tobacco taxation, tobacco pricing, excise tax, affordability, Gulf Cooperation Council
Citation: Delipalla S, Delipalla S, Hammerich A, Perucic A, El-Gohary S. The impact of tobacco tax implementation on price of tobacco products in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. East Mediterr Health J. 2024;30(x):xxx–xxx. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.24.020.
Received: 12/04/2023, Accepted: 15/01/2024
Copyright © Authors 2024; Licensee: World Health Organization. EMHJ is an open access journal. This paper is available under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Introduction
Since 2002 and until 2016, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries [Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)] relied solely on import duties (1). This comprised a duty of 100% of the cost, insurance and freight value applied to all tobacco products, together with a minimum duty (whichever was highest). In 2016, the minimum import duty was doubled in all GCC countries except Kuwait.
In 2016, the GCC countries agreed to implement harmonized excise taxes to reduce consumption of products harmful to human health (such as tobacco and sugar-sweetened beverages) and the environment, as well as on luxury goods to raise additional revenue by taxing wealthy individuals. The WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean has been working with the GCC countries since 2008 to address tobacco-related health problems and provide support regarding tax implementation and other tobacco control measures (2). The harmonized excise tax on tobacco products was set at a rate of 100% of the pretax price (3). The excise tax was first introduced in Saudi Arabia in June 2017, and the UAE and Bahrain followed in October and December, respectively. Qatar and Oman implemented the excise tax in January and June 2019, respectively. Kuwait is expected to follow suit in 2023/24 (4). In 2017, the GCC countries agreed to impose value added tax (VAT) at a standard (tax-exclusive) rate of 5% and a reduced rate of 0% (5). Saudi Arabia was the first to implement VAT in January 2018 and, in July 2020, it tripled its standard tax rate to 15%. The UAE implemented VAT in January 2018, Bahrain in January 2019 and Oman in April 2021. Bahrain doubled its standard VAT rate effective from January 2022 (6), Qatar is still preparing for its implementation (7) and Kuwait plans to introduce VAT in 2023/24 (4).
The introduction of the excise tax in 2017 and VAT in 2018 had a greater effect on the tobacco market than doubling import duty in 2016. The available data show both quantitative and qualitative effects 8). After tax implementation, legal sales dropped in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, but for Bahrain, no data are provided after 2017. The volume of imports fell and smokers substituted cheaper brands. In Saudi Arabia, the premium brands have been affected the most (8). Plain packaging, together with strong promotional activity and gift-giving options, facilitated substitution towards cheaper brands. Trading down has also occurred in the UAE, with the most common shift being from the mid-priced to economy brands (8).
Establishing the effect of tobacco taxation on consumer behaviour in recent years has been difficult because of a combination of factors. The price increase resulting from taxation policies, combined with the economic uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and increased health concerns, is expected to have made tobacco consumers more price sensitive. Tax increases and pandemic response measures, such as shutting down of international borders, along with closures and restrictions on trade and opening hours, have led some tobacco users to reduce consumption (especially among social smokers); some might have traded down to cheaper brands or other tobacco products; and some (probably those with strongest nicotine addiction) might have stockpiled in response to fear of shortages. The introduction of plain packaging in Saudi Arabia in 2019 might have also affected tobacco consumption.
The tax reforms and the pandemic forced tobacco companies to find strategies to maintain their market share, ensuring constant availability of their brands and positioning them at the right point of the price distribution. When VAT tripled in 2020 in Saudi Arabia, the industry introduced new brands positioned at the low end of the price distribution, reassessed the price of existing brands, and extended its portfolio by introducing novel tobacco products (8).
In this study, we evaluated the impact of tobacco tax implementation on consumer prices, affordability and substitution possibilities in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain. We assessed the weaknesses of the tax system and discussed how they could be addressed in future tax reforms. Otherwise, long-term responses by both smokers and the tobacco industry will negate the current progress. For comparison, we also looked at cigarette prices, price dispersion and affordability in Kuwait; a country that levies only an import duty and no excise tax on tobacco products.
Methods
To measure progress regarding tobacco tax implementation and its effectiveness, we examined its impact on cigarette price level, price dispersion and affordability. For such a task, the availability of relevant and reliable data is paramount. Unfortunately, until recently, the GCC countries lacked good practices for systematic data collection and dissemination. The only available data on the tobacco industry were those provided by international consultancies.
Our evaluation of the impact of excise tax implementation on cigarettes in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain was based on open-source secondary data reported to WHO by the countries concerned. WHO collects on a biennial basis global information on the price level and applicable statutory taxes on cigarettes. The data are collected through a survey tool from national government officials, upon which WHO standardizes the data so that it is comparable across countries (9). The estimates are then shared with countries for sign-off before they are made public. For the purpose of this evaluation, a simple descriptive analysis involving tabulation of the secondary WHO data on cigarette excise taxes, price levels, price dispersion, and affordability in the selected countries was conducted.
Results
Impact of excise tax impact on price level
In all GCC countries, the price (international dollars at Purchasing Power Parity, PPP$) of the most-sold cigarette brand rose sharply after 2016, with the highest increase in Saudi Arabia and the lowest in Kuwait (Figure 1) (10). Saudi Arabia implemented both an excise tax and VAT, and the latter was tripled 2 years after its introduction. Kuwait did not implement either type of tax.
In 2020, the average price, weighted by the number of current smokers, of the most-sold brand in 54 high-income countries was PPP$8.94 and the corresponding total tax was PPP$6.04 (10). The average total tax share was 67.6% of the pack price of the most sold brand. In the GCC countries, the total tax share ranged from 18.91% in Kuwait to 73.84% in Saudi Arabia. Figure 2 depicts the price and tax level of the most-sold brand, as well as the total tax share in the final price in 2020, in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain, as well as Kuwait for comparison.
Given the implementation of the excise tax and the current VAT rate of 15%, it is not surprising that Saudi Arabia had the highest cigarette price and tax share for the most-sold brand. Figure 3 compares the structure of cigarette taxation in the 4 GCC states.
Note that all taxes (import duty, excise and VAT) are of the ad valorem type and set as a percentage of the price before tax (tax-exclusive rate). Therefore, tobacco companies have a strong incentive to register a lower cost, insurance and freight and distribution price, making the final sales price vulnerable to manipulation by the tobacco industry.
Impact of excise tax on price dispersion and affordability
To evaluate the effectiveness of tobacco taxation, we used the dispersion index and affordability index. The price dispersion index captured the relative price: the price of the cheapest brand as a percentage of the price of the most expensive brand (100). An increase in the index indicated that the price gap between the cheapest and most expensive brand decreased; therefore, smokers had fewer opportunities to substitute downwards (10). Figure 4 depicts the price of the premium and cheapest brands in 2020 in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Kuwait. The price of the cheapest brand was substantially lower than the price of the most expensive brand in all countries. In 2020, the price dispersion index for Saudi Arabia was 50%, which means that the price of the most expensive brand was double that of the cheapest brand. In the UAE, the price dispersion index was 54.76% and the price of the most expensive brand was 1.83 times higher than that of the cheapest brand. In Bahrain, the dispersion index was the lowest (34.78%) and the price of the most expensive brand was 2.88 times higher than that of the cheapest brand. Smokers had an incentive to switch to cheaper brands in all countries. In Kuwait, the dispersion index was low, as was the price of premium and low economy brands (10).
The second measure was the cigarette affordability index, which is the amount required to buy 100 cigarette packs (or 2000 cigarettes) of the most-sold brand as a percentage of per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in a specific year. Affordability indices can be used for comparison among countries and within the same country over time. Among countries, a higher index indicates that cigarettes are more expensive in relation to income. For a specific country, an increase in affordability index over time indicates that cigarettes have become less affordable, and consumption is discouraged (10). During 2010–2020, cigarettes became less affordable in all countries of interest, with the highest growth rate (15.38%) taking place in Saudi Arabia (10). In 2020, the affordability index was 3.81% in Saudi Arabia and only 1.27% in Kuwait. The affordability index increased for all countries between 2010 and 2020, with the highest increase in Saudi Arabia and the lowest in Kuwait (Figure 5). The total cost of smoking and secondhand smoke in Kuwait was KWD481 million in 2017, which was equivalent to 1.43% of its GDP and the highest among the 6 GCC countries (11). Even though cigarettes have become less affordable over the last few years, affordability was higher relative to the rest of the world. This was likely a significant contributor to the Eastern Mediterranean Region being the only WHO region with (observed and predicted) increased male smoking prevalence (12).
Discussion
Saudi Arabia was the first GCC country to implement both excise taxation and VAT on tobacco products, and the rate of VAT was tripled within 2 years of its introduction. These reforms brought Saudi Arabia closer to the top-performing countries for tobacco control (13). Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain, which implemented the excise tax in 2017, were faced with sharp price increases, with the highest increase taking place in Saudi Arabia. In all 3 countries, total tax share was > 70% of the final retail price, with this share, again, being highest in Saudi Arabia.
Even though the dispersion and affordability indices improved in all 3 countries, Saudi Arabia performed better for both measures. This means that smokers have fewer opportunities to switch to cheaper brands, and cigarettes have become less affordable, with the increasing trend in affordability index being highest in Saudi Arabia.
However, there is room for improvement. The tax system has some weaknesses that can easily be addressed in future tax reforms. Otherwise, long-term responses by smokers and the tobacco industry will negate the current progress. The main limitation is the tax structure. Import duty and excise tax are both based on the pre-tax (i.e., ex-factory) price and, apart from the misleading impression of imposing a high rate, this provides the industry with the incentive to misdeclare its cost, insurance and freight values and distribution prices, or to import or introduce new, cheaper brands. It also leads to greater variability in prices, providing opportunities of trading down to cheaper brands when prices rise because of taxation. In general, structures that rely on ad valorem taxes are more difficult to administer and susceptible to industry manipulation. A change in the tax structure, involving the introduction of a specific excise component, would increase both prices and the tax share, redirecting revenues from industry to government. This would decrease price variability and opportunities for tax avoidance and evasion. The recent introduction of a minimum excise tax was a step in the right direction. The minimum excise tax must be regularly adjusted for inflation and income growth. Increasing the VAT rate further will bring it closer to the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average. The average VAT is 19.3% in OECD countries and 21.8% in the 22 OECD countries that are also members of the EU (14).
Based on data availability, we discuss the challenges arising from excise tax implementation in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. One of the SCARE tactics of the tobacco industry is to exaggerate the size of the illicit tobacco trade when tax rate increases and structure reforms are announced (15). The industry centres attention around tax or price differentials as the main determinant of illicit trade, and not on the fact that this is enabled by weak governance and social norms, as well as poor tax and customs administration. The extent to which countries enable illicit trade in tobacco (and in general) depends on: government policies (monitoring and prevention); the market conditions that may encourage supply and demand of illicit tobacco products; and the trade and customs environment, including governance over free trade zones.
The Global Illicit Trade Environment Index is used to evaluate the structural capability of economies to inhibit illicit trade; that is, effectiveness of laws, regulations and governance (16). According to the Index, the Middle East and Africa region ranks last, mainly because it scores low in the categories of supply and demand, and transparency and trade. This means the countries do not exploit their full potential to combat illicit trade, including strengthening of tax and customs administration. Saudi Arabia ranks 50th and the UAE 34th among 84 countries (16). The only category in which the UAE ranks worse than Saudi Arabia is transparency and trade. This is a result of the free trade zones in the country. Free trade zones facilitate trade and economic growth but also illicit trade, because of weak infrastructure, weak enforcement and corruption.
Until 2016, the difference between total (imports minus exports, which were all re-exports because there was no domestic cigarette production) and legal sales of cigarettes was constant, but the gap widened after that (8). Irrespective of the accuracy of the Euromonitor data, tax increases tend to create opportunities for gains from illicit transactions. Therefore, it is advised that tax increases should be accompanied by reforms that strengthen the tax and customs administration, enforcement and judiciary system, as well as regional and international collaboration and agreements on information sharing and customs cooperation.
To the best of our knowledge, 3 cross-sectional studies have investigated the impact of excise tax implementation on cigarette consumption, as well as the socioeconomic and health factors associated with smoking behaviour (17–19). Two of these studies were conducted in Riyadh and 1 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The data were self-reported and hence subject to recall and social desirability bias. They depended on participants’ recall and honesty, which were especially important in a traditional and conservative society. Regardless of the accuracy of the method, however, and although the results cannot be generalized to the whole country, the studies still provide some clear policy guidance. Tax-induced price increases may have only short-term effects on consumption; hence, sizeable and continuous tax increases are required to combat smoking. What matters is a continuous and significant reduction in cigarette affordability, and optimizing tax structure is important for eliminating trading down to cheaper alternatives.
More studies and other methods are needed to assess the long-term impact of tax implementation on price and consumption of tobacco products. The benefits of reduction in tobacco use for human health and the environment have been discussed elsewhere (9). Primary data on cigarette sales and prices by brand, and for a longer period, are needed to conduct more reliable studies on the impact of tax. Countries and implementers of prevention programmes are encouraged to allocate resources to collect more detailed data and make these publicly available to provide a database to evaluate programme effectiveness. Lack of local knowledge when interpreting the data from international consultancies used in our evaluation may lead to misleading measurements and unreliable progress reports and policy evaluations. We need data on the use of all tobacco product alternatives, to conduct an economic analysis regarding the extent to which new and emerging products are considered substitutes for conventional cigarettes.
Conclusions and recommendations
The main barrier to evaluating the impact of excise tax on the price of tobacco products in the GCC countries was the lack of data. In the GCC countries, there is a gap between health and tax economics researchers and policy-makers that needs to be bridged (20). The GCC countries must build up systematic data collection and measurement capabilities, as well as dissemination strategies, to avoid misleading measurements and unreliable progress reports. The establishment of a tobacco economics research centre is urgently needed to facilitate comprehensive and consistent collection of data, and enhance collaboration between government agencies, academia, researchers and policy-makers. National health surveys must take place regularly, using the same methodology and time period for all surveys and across all GCC countries. Given current data limitations, our descriptive analysis serves to clarify the importance of tobacco taxation as a tool for public policy.
The main limitation of the tobacco tax system is its structure. Import duty and excise tax are based on pre-tax price and, apart from the misleading impression of imposing a high rate, this provides the industry with the incentive to misdeclare its cost, insurance and freight values and distribution prices, or to import or introduce new, cheaper brands. It also leads to greater variability in prices, providing opportunities of trading down to cheaper brands, when prices rise after taxation. A change in tax structure, involving the introduction of a specific excise component, would increase both prices and tax share, redirecting revenues from industry to government. It would also decrease price variability and opportunities for tax avoidance and evasion. The minimum excise needs to be automatically adjusted for inflation (of importance in periods of persistently rising inflation) and income growth. Finally, increasing the VAT rate further will bring it closer to the OECD average and increase price and total tax share.
Continued collaboration among the GCC countries, based on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control provisions, to ensure a harmonized pricing system for all tobacco products, is necessary to reduce premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases and meet the target of a 30% reduction in tobacco use by 2030.
References
1. General Secretariat of the Gulf Cooperation Council. Gulf Customs Union. Unified customs tariff for GCC states. Oman: GCC Statistical Center; 2017 (https://gccstat.org/ar/statistic/standards/gcc-cet-2017, accessed 9 February 2024).
2. WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Tobacco excise duties in countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council. Cairo: WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2016 (https://www.emro.who.int/images/stories/tfi/documents/tobacco_excise_duties_in_gcc_2016.pdf?ua=1, accessed 9 February 2024).
3. General Secretariat of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The Unified Selective Tax Agreement for the Arab Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. General Secretariat of the GCC; 2016 (https://zatca.gov.sa/ar/RulesRegulations/Taxes/Documents/GCC_Unilateral_Agreement_for_Excise_Tax_Arabic.pdf, accessed 28 February 2024).
4. BDO. Update on Kuwait budget and VAT in Kuwait [website]. BDO; 2022 (https://www.vatupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021-08-13-Update-on-Kuwait-budget-and-VAT-in-Kuwait.pdf, accessed 9 February 2024).
5. General Secretariat of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Common VAT Agreement of the States of the Gulf Cooperation Council. General Secretariat of the GCC; 2017 (https://zatca.gov.sa/ar/RulesRegulations/Taxes/Documents/GCC%20VAT%20Agreement.pdf, accessed 4 March 2024).
6. PwC Middle East. VAT rate increase in Bahrain [website]. PwC Middle East; 2021 (https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/services/tax/me-tax-legal-news/2021/vat-rate-increase-in-bahrain-sep-2021.html, accessed 9 February 2024).
7. KPMG. Announcement of the Qatar VAT law expected in 2024. KPMG; 2023 (https://kpmg.com/qa/en/home/insights/2019/02/tnf-qatar-vat-regime-expected-2020.html, accessed 9 February 2024).
8. Euromonitor International. Tobacco in Saudi Arabia [website]. Euromonitor; 2021
(https://www.euromonitor.com/tobacco-in-saudi-arabia/report?recid=2785055506415, accessed 28 February 2024)
9. World Health Organization. WHO global report on tobacco epidemic 2021: Addressing new and emerging products. Geneva: WHO; 2021 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032095, accessed 9 February 2024).
10. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2023: protect people from tobacco smoke. Geneva: WHO; 2023 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077164#, accessed 9 February 2024).
11. Koronaiou K, Al-Lawati JA, Sayed M, Alwadey AM, Alalawi EF, Amutawaa K et al. Economic cost of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Tob Control 2021 Nov;30(6):680–6. PMID:32817575 https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055715
12. Gordon MRP, Perucic A-M, Totanes RAP. Cigarette affordability in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. East Mediterr Health J. 2020 Jan 30;26(1):55–60. PMID: 32043546. https://doi.org/10.26719/2020.26.1.55
13. Chaloupka F, Drope J, Siu E, Vulovic V, Mirza M, Rodriguez-Iglesias G et al. Tobacconomics cigarette tax scorecard (2nd ed.). Chicago: Tobacconomics; 2021.
14. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Consumption tax trends 2022 – VAT/GST and excise. Core design features and trends [website]. Paris: OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration; 2022 (https://www.oecd.org/tax/consumption-tax-trends-19990979.htm, accessed 9 February 2024).
15. World Health Organization. WHO technical manual on tobacco tax policy and administration. Geneva: WHO; 2021 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240019188, accessed 9 February 2024).
16. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). The Global Illicit Trade Environment Index. A report by the Economist Intelligence Unit. EIU; 2018.
(https://impact.economist.com/projects/deliver-change/documents/EIU-Global-Illicit-Trade-Environment-Index-2018-FTZ-June-6-FINAL.pdf, accessed 26 February 2024).
17. Abu-Shaheen A, Altannir Y, Altannir M. Tobacco price increase and consumption behaviour among male smokers in Riyadh: a community-based study. East Mediterr Health J. 2020 Dec 9;26(12):1518–24. PMID:33355391
https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.20.066
18. Aljuaid SO, Alshammari SA, Almarshad FA, Almutairi KS, Aljumayi AS, Al Khashan HI et al. Taxation and tobacco plain packaging effect on Saudi smokers quitting intentions in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia, Saudi Med J. 2020 Oct;41(10):1121–9. PMID:33026054 https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2020.10.25390
19. Alghamdi A, Fallatah A, Okal F, Felemban T, Eldigire M, Almodaimegh H. Smoking behaviour after enforcement of a 100% tax on tobacco products in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. East Mediterr Health J. 2020 Jan 30;26(1):39–46. PMID:32043544 https://doi.org/10.26719/2020.26.1.39
20. Almazrou SH, Ajaujan SS, Al-Aqeel SA. Barriers and facilitators to conducting economic evaluation studies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: a survey of researchers. Health Res Policy Sys 2021;19:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00721-1
Cigarette smoking trajectories from adolescence to young adulthood: first report from the Middle East
Hasti Masihay-Akbar1, Soha Razmjouei1, Elaheh Ainy2, Leila Cheraghi1,3, Fereidoun Azizi4, Parisa Amiri
1. Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
2. Department of Vice Chancellor Research Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
4. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Correspondence:
Paris Amiri
Research Center for Social Determinants of Health
Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
PO box 19395-4763, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Tel.: +98 21 240 9309, Fax: +98 21 240 2463
E-mail:
Abstract
Background: This study is the first effort in the Middle East to identify cigarette-smoking trajectories and their predictors, from adolescence to young adulthood.
Methods: Using data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, 1169 adolescents (12–18 years old) were followed into their young adulthood (28–32 years old), from 2002 to 2016. Cigarette smoking (combination of quantity and frequency) was the outcome variable used for group-based trajectory modelling. After detecting the trajectories, the effects of independent variables (individual employment, education, physical activity, and paternal smoking, employment and education) on the trajectories were investigated.
Results: Three trajectories were detected: non-smokers (79%), experimenters (12%) and escalators (9%). Compared to girls, boys were approximately three times (OR=2.94, 95%CI: 2.32-3.24, P
Conclusion: Iranian adolescents follow three trajectories – non-smokers, experimenters and escalators – into young adulthood. Male sex, employment after high school, and living with a smoker father are associated with unfavourable smoking patterns. These findings provide valuable insight that can be translated into practical interventions tailored to the local context.
Keywords: Smoking trajectories, cigarette smoking, adolescence, young adulthood, longitudinal
Citation: Masihay-Akbar H, Razmjouei S, Ainy E, Cheraghi L, Azizi F and Amiri P. Cigarette smoking trajectories from adolescence to young adulthood: first report from the Middle East. East Mediterr Health J. 2023;29(11):xxx–xxx. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.23.115 Received: 25/01/23; Accepted: 24/07/23
Copyright: © Authors; Licensee: World Health Organization. EMHJ is an open access journal. All papers published in EMHJ are available under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences and the National Research Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran (EC 121). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets used and/or analysed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Authors’ contributions
HM-A and PA designed the study. FA and PA contributed to the design of the TLGS. LC conducted the statistical analysis. HM-A, SR, EA and LC contributed to interpretation of data. HM-A and SR contributed to writing the original draft. PA, FA and EA reviewed and revised the draft manuscript. PA and FA supervised drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the TLGS participants and personnel for their collaboration.
Background
The negative health consequences of cigarette smoking and its attributed morbidity and mortality are well known (1). As the most common type of tobacco use, cigarette smoking continues to be a public health problem. Globally, 22.3% of the population uses tobacco, 36.7% of all men and 7.8% of the world’s women (2). In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the prevalence of smoking and daily cigarette smoking among adults in 2016 was 14.1 and 9.7%, respectively. The prevalence of smokers in adolescents was 3.4% (3,4).
Cigarette smoking is a complex and dynamic behaviour that follows a progressive pattern throughout the life course (5). Most adult smokers start smoking in adolescence (6), making it a critical period in developing smoking behaviour. The importance of this period has made it the target of most smoking-prevention interventions for many years. Although effective in preventing and delaying smoking initiation, these interventions often fail to stop smoking progression (7).
In adulthood, when smoking behaviour has already been established, the focus shifts towards cessation interventions. Therefore, the path between experimentation with tobacco products and established smoking behaviour that occurs during young adulthood is often neglected (8,9).
The dynamicity of smoking behaviour makes it logical to examine its longitudinal pattern to understand how and when this behaviour forms in different subpopulations. Trajectory analysis can help describe the longitudinal trend of cigarette use, identify subgroups at risk of sustained and heavy smoking, and pinpoint the optimum time to intervene (10,11).
Many North American and European cohort studies have used this method to identify smoking trajectories (11). While most of them traced smoking into adolescence, few have examined smoking behaviours from adolescence through young adulthood (12–17). Previous studies also varied in duration of follow-up (between 1.5 and 23 years) and measurement intervals (between three months and 4.5 years) (11). Researchers used different indicators for smoking in previous articles, including smoking frequency (number of days of smoking in a period of time), smoking intensity (number of cigarettes smoked in a defined time) and a combination of intensity and frequency.
Given the methodological and analytical disparities, the observed trajectories in prior research diverged in terms of quantity, ranging from two to six. Studies with fewer data points detected a lower number of trajectories. In terms of typology (the visual inspection of the curves), trajectories with lowest level of cigarette consumption were the most prevalent, followed by increasing pattern.
In the existing body of literature, various factors have been identified as predictors of cigarette smoking-trajectory membership. These include age, sex/gender, race, parental education and smoking, peers’ smoking, other substance use, and depression. While some of these predictors remain consistent over time, such as race and sex, others, such as socioeconomic and behavioural predictors, are subject to change throughout the lifespan. However, these results are not generalizable to the countries with socio-cultural differences.
Results from longitudinal studies in Middle Eastern countries, including Iran, indicate high progression rates from the primary stages of the smoking behaviour spectrum to established consumption in school years (18–20). Yet, with the maximum follow-up time of three years, few of them have delved into changes in smoking behaviour in the transition from adolescence to young adulthood.
The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), one of the unique longitudinal cohorts in the Middle East, provides an opportunity to conduct advanced analysis on tobacco-related data and prepares preliminary data for designing age- and stage-sensitive interventions in the region. Leveraging the TLGS data, this study is designed to fill the gaps mentioned above and enrich the smoking-related literature on the topic.
The first objective of the study is to identify the developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking from adolescence to young adulthood. The second objective is to identify the individual and parental predictors of the membership of each trajectory.
Methods
Sampling and participants
Data is drawn from TLGS, an ongoing family-based cohort study to capture non-communicable disease prevalence and risk factors in an urban population of Iran. The multistage cluster random sampling method was used to select the target sample. In stage one, three of the 20 health care centres in district 13 of Tehran were selected, based on geographical location and data availability.
In the second stage, the data of 15 005 residents (≥3 years) were randomly collected from those health care centres. TLGS included a cross-sectional phase (1999–2001) with five follow-up examinations at three-year intervals (2002–2004; 2005–2007; 2008–2010; 2011–2013; and 2014 –2016). Details of TLGS design and sampling were previously published (21).
This study was restricted to participants aged 12–18 years (n=1567), who were followed from 2002 to 2016. After excluding 396 individuals with at least three missing in the smoking variable and two individuals who died over the follow-ups, analysis was conducted on the data of the remaining 1169 participants. The median follow-up for the whole population was 12.5 years.
Measurements
Smoking: As per previous use in the literature (11,22), in order to concisely capture diverse patterns of smoking behaviour (especially occasional smoking, whose pattern may not be succinctly captured solely with frequency and intensity variables), we created a metric for smoking by combining intensity and frequency. At each follow-up measurement, smoking data was acquired using standard questionnaires. Adolescents (≤18 years) reported their quantity (number of cigarettes in one day) and frequency of smoking (number of days in the past 30 days).
We categorized each variable as follows: quantity:
Individual covariates: Employment status was defined as follows: before age 18, when attending school is compulsory, all participants were considered unemployed; and after 18 years of age (adulthood), anyone who reported a change in employment status to having a job was categorized as employed; otherwise, they were considered unemployed. A highly educated person was defined as someone who has studied for more than 12 years or reports university education after finishing high school. Binary sex was also added as covariate.
The Persian translation of the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire was used to assess physical activity (PA) in adolescents (23). PA type (leisure and occupational activities), frequency and duration over the past 12 months were reported. The number of minutes/weeks for each activity was multiplied to its metabolic equivalent. Subsequently, an individual’s total PA was calculated by adding up domains of PA, and levels were defined as low (Parental covariates: For each parent, employment was defined based on having or not having a job. Regarding education, parents were categorized as illiterate/primary, secondary/diploma, and higher. For their smoking status, parents were classified as current smokers (smoking always or occasionally) and non-smokers.
Statistical analysis
We used group-based trajectory models (GBTM) to identify cigarette-smoking trajectories from age 12 to 32. The analytic sample was 12–18-year-olds of baseline who became 28–32-year-olds in the last follow-up. We estimated zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) trajectory models with a user-written programme called TRAJ (24). The zero-inflated model is used when analysing count data that has excess zero counts (zero-inflated). The excess zeros are suggested to be generated by a separate process from the count values and can be modelled independently. Therefore, the ZIP model combines two distributional forms: a Poisson count model and a Logit model for predicting excess zeros (25).
To assess the appropriateness and suitability of the model, we created and examined visual representations depicting the distribution of the smoking index at baseline and subsequent follow-up examinations. Through the visual representations, we identified a significant number of zero values in the data, which aligned with our expectations given the age range of the participants, especially at baseline. These zero values correspond to individuals who can be categorized as non-smokers, indicating the absence of reported smoking.
At the beginning of the study, 98% of individuals had a smoking index value of zero. As the follow-up examinations progressed, the percentage of individuals with a zero smoking index decreased gradually, measuring 95%, 90%, 86% and 81% in the first through the last follow-up examinations, respectively. Subsequently, we investigated the possible number of latent trajectories by a series of models considering several linear and polynomial (cubic, quadratic) specifications of the smoking index as a function of age.
For better model detection, age was centralized at 20 years. GBTM (10) was used to identify subgroups of participants who shared similar underlying trajectories of the outcome variables. In a GBTM framework, the latent growth factors, that is, intercepts and slopes, determine each group’s trajectory. The intercept refers to the initial smoking index for 20-year-old participants in phase two, and the slopes correspond to the rate of linear or non-linear change in the smoking trajectory across assessments. Adding quadratic or cubic growth parameters to the model helped to capture nonlinear trajectories.
We began with a single model consisting of one group and then increased the number of groups until the number of trajectories that best fit the data was identified based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the average posterior probability of group membership (APP) and the odds of correct classification (OCC).
We tested models (see Table 1) with one to four groups and different specifications of smoking index as a function of age for each group and for zero-inflation probability. The three-group model with linear function of age for the first group and cubic function of age for the second and third groups was selected (model 12). The optimal model was selected as the lowest BIC (BIC= -2509.77), highest APP greater than 0.70, OCC more than five, and the minimum of 5% of the total sample for the size of each class. The same model with three groups and a quadratic function of age for zero-inflation probability (model 26) had a slight decrease in BIC value; however, as this model was more complex and model 12 was better interpretable, the former was chosen.
[ADD Table 1: Model fit indices for the trajectory model analysis NEAR HERE]
In this analysis, the BIC value increased for models with more than three trajectory groups. The models with four or more groups did not fit well and, as a result, the three-group model was considered optimal. For each subject, the model provides the probability of belonging to each of the identified trajectories and then assigns the subject to the group where it has the highest chance. Based on the existing literature, the selected model’s substantive and theoretical interpretability were also considered.
While classifying the GBTM model, there was a possibility to add predictors to increase the accuracy of fit indices and shapes of trajectories. We included the effect of some previously studied covariates associated with smoking behaviours as time-stable predictors (individual sex, employment, education, physical activity, and paternal smoking, employment and education) on the defined trajectory groups. These covariates were included as time-invariant.
Missing data was handled using the STATA programme (24) in this study. The TRAJ programme uses the maximum likelihood method to estimate parameters, including group sizes and shapes of trajectories. When the data is assumed missing at random, this method generates an asymptotically unbiased parameter. Subjects with missing data are included in the analysis but only available data for each subject are used (10).
To determine whether “missingness” affected the results (whether missing data is random or not), we explored missing data patterns and their effects on investigated smoking trajectories. A variable was created to represent the number of missing data among five data points for each participant and compared among three smoking-trajectory groups. In this study, there were potentially five data points for each participant.
In running the trajectory analysis, only participants with three or more available measurements of smoking are included; therefore, included participants may have zero, one or two missing smoking measurements. Having no or one missing data point in smoking was compared with having two missing data points, in prediction of trajectory membership. In addition, four dummy variables were made, representing missing data in the middle of follow-up examinations, and investigating the associations between any of these dummy variables and smoking-trajectory groups.
We conducted the trajectory analysis, including identification of the optimal trajectories and determining associated variables with the explored trajectories in STATA software version 16 and the remained analysis in IBM SPSS Statistics version 26; two-sided P values of
Results
The tested models in the GBTM are shown in Table 1. The APP of each group in the selected model ranged from 0.93 to 0.95, the estimated group sizes were close to the actual ones, and the OCC exceeded five, suggesting a good fit and accurate group assignment. The three groups were named as non-smokers (n=918, 79%), experimenters (n=146, 12%) and escalators (n=105, 9%).
As presented quantitatively in Table 2 and visually in Figure 1, the non-smokers represented the largest group in the sample, which followed intercept and a very slight linear trajectory.
[ADD Table 2: Parameter estimates of the trajectory model with a zero-inflated Poisson distributional form NEAR HERE]
[ADD Figure 1 NEAR HERE]
Both the experimenter and escalator groups had positive slopes, with negative quadratic function and positive cubic function of age. However, the magnitude of estimated parameters for slope, quadratic and cubic functions was smaller in the escalator group, causing a more-steeply increasing graph overall than the experimenter group.
The experimenters showed a smoking index similar to the non-smokers until 16 years of age and gradually increased their cigarette use into a young adulthood steady phase, which started to rise again at the age of 30. The escalators diverged from non-smokers and experimenters at age 14 and increased their cigarette smoking frequency/quantity with a negative quadratic trajectory followed by a late positive cubic trajectory.
Socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics of adolescents and their parents are represented in Table 3. The mean baseline age of adolescents was 15.14±1.97, 15.23±1.81 and 15.21±2.05 years, in non-smokers, experimenters and escalators, respectively. While boys comprised 35% of non-smokers, they formed the majority of the experimenters (70%) and escalators (89%). Experimenters were more physically active. No significant difference was observed in parental characteristics between trajectories, except for paternal smoking (P
[ADD Table 3: Baseline characteristics of adolescents and their parents according to smoking-trajectory group NEAR HERE]
Table 4 presents the effects of individual covariates in predicting trajectory membership, including participants’ sex, education, employment, PA and missingness as well as paternal smoking status and missingness. Boys were three times and 25 times more likely than girls, respectively, to be experimenters and escalator smokers rather than non-smokers.
[ADD Table 4: Associated factors of the identified smoking trajectories using zero-inflated Poisson model NEAR HERE]
Receiving university education decreased the odds of placing in the escalator trajectory by 18% (P=0.001). Getting employed showed undesirable effects, as it doubled the odds of experimenter and escalator group membership (respectively, OR=2.00 and OR=2.33, P
Our model shows that, compared to those with no or one missing data point, adolescents with two missing data points are more likely to be in the escalator group (OR=2.03, 95% CI: 1.41-2.65, P=0.02). Paternal smoking (at any point during the study) is associated with 1.88- and 2.23-times higher odds of following an experimenter and escalator trajectory, respectively.
Discussion
Using data from TLGS, a population-based cohort study in the Islamic Republic of Iran, we followed 1169 Iranian adolescents for 15 years and identified three developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking: non-smokers (79%), experimenters (12%) and escalators (9%). Male sex, employment after age 18 and having a smoker father increased the likelihood of experimentation with smoking and continuing at a higher intensity. Participants with a university education were less likely to be escalator smokers. Physical activity level had no predictive value in trajectory-group membership.
In this study, using GBTM, we detected three distinct trajectories of cigarette smoking from adolescence to young adulthood. The majority of our sample was non-smokers. The second prevalent group was experimenters, with approximately one-sixth of the prevalence of non-smokers.
Experimenters started smoking at about 16 years of age at a low rate, increased their consumption from 18, and maintained a low-steady state between 24 and 30 years of age. This group seemed to increase cigarette smoking from the early fourth decade of their life.
Escalators, with less than 10% prevalence, started smoking increasingly from early adolescence (before 14 years of age). This increasing trend became steeper in young adulthood, highlighting the importance of this period.
Longitudinal studies from the Middle East region indicate high progression rates from the primary stages of the smoking behaviour spectrum to established school-age consumption. A large-scale study in Jordan showed a 38% increase in the frequency and intensity of smoking during three school years (18).
In Iran, the transition rate from never smoking to experimentation has been reported to be between 10% and 14% in different adolescent samples. Moreover, 16-17% of novice smokers reported continued regular smoking after one to three years (19,20). However, investigating the developmental pathways of smoking behaviour using different trajectory analysis methods has only been conducted in North American and European populations. Variations in the density of measurements, smoking indicators and time axis resulted in various numbers of trajectories between two and six (11).
In line with our results, the most common finding in these studies was a large non-smoker group, which made up the majority of the sample. Occasional or light smoker, early-onset, and late-onset stable or increasing groups were other identified trajectories. Previous studies with relatively larger sample sizes, more data points or shorter time intervals detected additional smoking patterns, such as quitters or decliners (15,17,26–28). These minority groups include adolescents who, despite smoking initiation, did not become established smokers.
In contrast, we did not detect such decreasing trends in our sample. The absence of a quitter group may be influenced by the characteristics of our study sample. It is possible that the prevalence of individuals who successfully quit smoking during the observed time period was relatively low or that the quitting patterns did not meet the criteria for forming a separate trajectory group. In this case, targeted interventions are needed in Iran to prevent smoking acceleration as mid- and late-adolescents move towards young adulthood.
On the other hand, the identification of specific trajectory groups depends on the underlying distribution of smoking behaviours and the fit of the statistical model to the observed data. Therefore, it is also plausible that the patterns of smoking cessation in our study did not exhibit clear trajectory profiles that could be distinguished from other trajectory groups. In this regard, future studies are needed to examine quitting trajectories and provide a comprehensive understanding of smoking cessation patterns.
Generally, participants’ sex, education, employment and paternal smoking were predictive of trajectory-group membership in this study. In line with previous studies, we found that boys are more likely than girls to follow the experimenter and escalator trajectory. However, the significant difference between girls and boys is consistent with previous studies in Iran, which might be related to the taboo of female smoking, and underreporting.
In this study, continuing education beyond high school is associated with reduced odds of smoking escalation. Education has been previously examined in relation to smoking trajectories with different indicators and definitions, such as academic performance through school years and years/level of education (14,16). In line with our results, many studies found that education is a predicting factor in trajectory-group membership. In contrast, others have investigated education as an outcome of long-term smoking, showing that those who start smoking sooner and with increasing intensity have lower education and academic performance (17).
Our data also showed that being employed after 18 is associated with membership of both riskier trajectory groups (experimenter and escalator). This finding contradicts previous studies that found unemployment increases the chance of being in high-risk groups. It might be interpreted that, in Iranian youth, employment does not act as a direct socioeconomic indicator but as a factor that could interfere with continued education after high school or cause low academic performance. As stated in previous studies, young Iranians in wealthier neighbourhoods smoke more than those in poorer areas (29,30).
Our results show that paternal smoking was associated with 1.88 times higher odds of being in the experimenter group and doubled the odds of following an escalating trajectory. This is consistent with many studies confirming the association between parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation and intensity (11,31–33).
The intergenerational transmission could be due to more and easier access to cigarettes and weaker smoking policies at home. Although in previous studies, mothers’ smoking had a stronger effect on offspring tobacco use (32,33), studies of the TLGS sample did not find maternal smoking to be important in their children’s smoking behaviours. This could be due to Iranian women underreporting their smoking and acting more conservatively in the family in this regard.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first effort to identify smoking developmental pathways in the Middle East region. With a large sample size and long follow-up time, the TLGS cohort study allowed us to examine trajectories of smoking behaviours from adolescence to young adulthood in association with some influential factors.
In this study, we created a metric for smoking by combining intensity and frequency to better capture diverse patterns of smoking behaviour (especially among occasional and non-daily smokers). This method has been used in previous studies investigating trajectories of cigarette smoking (11,22). While our study’s predictors may align with previous findings, its significance lies in its focus on the Middle East region, and its potential to inform targeted interventions and policies that are culturally appropriate and address the challenges and dynamics of the Middle Eastern context.
Our findings have the potential to guide targeted and tailored interventions that address the needs and challenges faced by individuals within each identified trajectory. Given that the majority of the sample consisted of non-smokers, it is crucial to maintain and reinforce this non-smoking behaviour. Thus, prevention programmes should focus on promoting and strengthening the non-smoking trajectory.
Recognizing their trajectory, early intervention can be designed to target experimenters during late adolescence and young adulthood. These interventions should emphasize the risks associated with continued smoking and provide support for smoking cessation and behaviour change. Future studies are needed to investigate the triggers or reasons behind the increase in smoking during the early fourth decade of life to prevent escalation.
Targeted intervention for escalators who are at high risk for long-term smoking and associated health consequences should be developed and implemented to address this group’s needs, focusing on preventing the acceleration of smoking behaviour in young adulthood.
Limitations
In the analysis of this study, we were unable to capture the effects of variables that could vary over time due to data availability. Although these covariates were included as time-invariant, we defined their categories to detect one-point changes throughout the study. For example, a change in employment status was defined as a change from unemployment to having a job in any follow-up after age 18. More prospective research is needed to examine the effect of time-varying data on smoking trajectories.
Due to low prevalence of smoking in girls, we could not examine parental smoking influences on boys and girls separately in this study. Future studies with adequate sample size are needed to assess the sex-specific smoking trajectories in Iran. This study is also limited by self-reported questionnaires, which may have been prone to underreporting and recall bias, especially in women.
As the data were unavailable, other tobacco-related factors, such as mental health, family structure, peer smoking, attitudes and beliefs towards smoking, other risky behaviours and use of other substances like alcohol were not considered in this analysis.
Another limitation of our study is the potential presence of sampling bias. Our sample was drawn from urban areas of the capital city of Tehran, which may not be fully representative of the broader population in Iran or the Middle East. It is important to consider this potential bias when interpreting the results and applying them to wider populations. To mitigate this bias, future studies should aim for more diverse and representative samples that encompass different regions, socioeconomic backgrounds and cultural contexts within the Middle East. This would enhance the external validity and generalizability of the findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of cigarette-smoking trajectories in the region.
Additionally, our study focused on adolescents and young adults, and the findings may not fully capture the smoking trajectories and predictors beyond this age range. Future research should consider extending the study duration and including participants across a broader age range to examine the long-term trajectories and predictors of smoking behaviour.
Conclusion
Iranian adolescents follow three trajectories – non-smokers, experimenters and escalators – to young adulthood. Male sex, employment after high school, and living with a smoker father are associated with unfavourable smoking behaviour patterns. On the other hand, continued education has protective effects against increasingly high levels of cigarette use.
References
1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). 2014. PMID: 24455788.
2. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2021: addressing new and emerging products. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2021. (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/343287).
3. WHO EMRO; 2018. Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS), Fact Sheet Islamic Republic of Iran 2016. (https://portal-uat.who.int/fctcapps/sites/default/files/2023-04/iran_2018_annex-1_GYTS_factsheet_2016.pdf).
4. Sohrabi M-R, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Kolahi A-A. Current Tobacco Smoking Prevalence Among Iranian Population: A Closer Look at the STEPS Surveys. Front Public Health. 2020;8:571062. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571062.
5. Mayhew KP, Flay BR, Mott JA. Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;59 Suppl 1:S61-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00165-9.
6. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2012. PMID: 22876391.
7. Masihay-Akbar H, Amiri P, Cheraghi L, Momenan AA, Azizi F. The Cigarette Smoking Initiation and Continuation in Adolescents Undergoing a Long-Term Behavioral Intervention. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(4):702–710. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa208.
8. Rath JM, Villanti AC, Abrams DB, Vallone DM. Patterns of tobacco use and dual use in US young adults: the missing link between youth prevention and adult cessation. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:679134. DOI: 10.1155/2012/679134.
9. Villanti AC, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Mermelstein R. Preventing Smoking Progression in Young Adults: the Concept of Prevescalation. Prev Sci. 2019;20(3):377–384. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0880-y.
10. Nagin D. Group-Based Modeling of Development. Boston (MA): Harvard University Press. 2005.
11. Ahun MN, Lauzon B, Sylvestre M-P, Bergeron-Caron C, Eltonsy S, O’Loughlin J. A systematic review of cigarette smoking trajectories in adolescents. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;83:102838. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102838.
12. White HR, Pandina RJ, Chen P-H. Developmental trajectories of cigarette use from early adolescence into young adulthood. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2002;65(2):167–178.
13. Orlando M, Tucker JS, Ellickson PL, Klein DJ. Developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking and their correlates from early adolescence to young adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(3):400–410. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.400.
14. Brook DW, Brook JS, Zhang C, Whiteman M, Cohen P, Finch SJ. Developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking from adolescence to the early thirties: Personality and behavioral risk factors. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(8):1283–1291. DOI: 10.1080/14622200802238993.
15. Dutra LM, Glantz SA, Lisha NE, Song AV. Beyond experimentation: Five trajectories of cigarette smoking in a longitudinal sample of youth. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171808. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171808.
16. Clergue-Duval V, Mary-Krause M, Bolze C, Fombonne E, Melchior M. Early Predictors of Trajectories of Tobacco Use Level from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: A 16-Year Follow-Up of the TEMPO Cohort Study (1999-2015). Eur Addict Res. 2019;25(1):2-9. DOI: 10.1159/000495759.
17. Lenk KM, Erickson DJ, Forster JL. Trajectories of Cigarette Smoking From Teens to Young Adulthood: 2000 to 2013. Am J Health Promot. 2018;32(5):1214–1220. DOI: 10.1177/0890117117696358.
18. Jaber R, Mzayek F, Madhivanan P, Khader Y, Maziak W. Predictors of Cigarette Smoking Progression Among a School-Based Sample of Adolescents in Irbid, Jordan: A Longitudinal Study (2008–2011). Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(4):403–409. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv100.
19. Mohammadpoorasl A, Fakhari A, Shamsipour M, Rostami F, Rashidian H. Transitions between the stages of smoking in Iranian adolescents. Prev Med. 2011;52(2):136–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.024.
20. Mohammadpoorasl A, Nedjat S, Fakhari A, Yazdani K, Fotouhi A. Predictors of transition in smoking stages in Iranian adolescents: latent transition analysis. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;20(5):330–339. PMID: 24952291.
21. Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Momenan AA, Hadaegh F, Mirmiran P, Hedayati M, et al. Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials. 2009;10(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-5.
22. Costello DM, Dierker LC, Jones BL, Rose JS. Trajectories of smoking from adolescence to early adulthood and their psychosocial risk factors. Health Psychol. 2008;27(6):811–818. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.811.
23. Delshad M, Ghanbarian A, Ghaleh NR, Amirshekari G, Askari S, Azizi F. Reliability and validity of the modifiable activity questionnaire for an Iranian urban adolescent population. Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:3. DOI: 10.4103/2008-7802.151433.
24. Jones BL, Nagin DS. A Note on a Stata Plugin for Estimating Group-based Trajectory Models. Sociological Methods & Research. 2013;42(4):608–613. DOI: 10.1177/0049124113503141.
25. Grimm KJ, Stegmann G. Modeling change trajectories with count and zero-inflated outcomes: Challenges and recommendations. Addict Behav. 2019;94:4–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.016.
26. Bradshaw M, Kent BV, Davidson JC, De Leon S. Parents, Peers, and Trajectories of Cigarette Smoking: A Group-Based Approach. Youth Soc. 2021;53(4):676–694. DOI: 10.1177/0044118x19862450.
27. Karp I, O’Loughlin J, Paradis G, Hanley J, Difranza J. Smoking trajectories of adolescent novice smokers in a longitudinal study of tobacco use. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(6):445–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.10.002.
28. Oura P, Rissanen I, Junno J-A, Harju T, Paananen M. Lifelong smoking trajectories of Northern Finns are characterized by sociodemographic and lifestyle differences in a 46-year follow-up. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16365. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73334-3.
29. Rezaei F, Nedjat S, Golestan B, Majdzadeh R. Comparison of onset age and pattern of male adolescent smoking in two different socioeconomic districts of Tehran, Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2011;2(4):224–228.
30. Kelishadi R, Shahsanai A, Qorbani M, Esmaeil Motlagh M, Jari M, Ardalan G et al. Tobacco Use and Influencing Factors Among Iranian Children and Adolescents at National and Subnational Levels, According to Socioeconomic Status: The Caspian-IV Study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(5):e21858. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.21858.
31. Mays D, Gilman SE, Rende R, Luta G, Tercyak KP, Niaura RS. Parental smoking exposure and adolescent smoking trajectories. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):983–991. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3003.
32. Gilman SE, Rende R, Boergers J, Abrams DB, Buka SL, Clark MA et al. Parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation: an intergenerational perspective on tobacco control. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e274–281. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-2251.
33. Leonardi-Bee J, Jere ML, Britton J. Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2011;66(10):847–855. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.153379.
Epidemiology of scorpion stings in the West Bank, Palestinian Territories
Running title: Scorpion stings in the Palestinian Territories
Elias N. Handal1, Mohammad Abu Serhan1, Mazin B. Qumsiyeh1, Rihan Bani Hani2, David A. Warrell3, Zuhair S. Amr2
1Palestine Institute for Biodiversity and Sustainability/Biodiversity Center, Bethlehem University
2 Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
3 Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: Zuhair S. Amr, Department of Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan; e-mail:
Abstract
Introduction: Scorpionism (scorpion sting envenoming) is an endemic public health concern in many Arab Middle Eastern countries. Our knowledge of the epidemiology of scorpion stings in the Palestinian Territories is very limited.
Methods: Records for 2175 cases of scorpion stings were obtained and retrospectively analysed for the years 2012 and 2014-2020 from the main hospitals in four districts in the West Bank.
Results: The average age and standard deviation (±SD) for both sexes was 24.7±17.5 years (22.7±16.5 and 27.1±18.4 years for males and females, respectively). The median age was 20 years and 47.2% were children under 18 years. Most cases were reported during the summer months, between June and October, with a peak in July–August. By anatomic site, the right hand was most commonly stung in both sexes, followed by the right foot, whereas the chest, buttocks and scrotum were the least affected body parts. Clinical data were available for 405 cases, in which pain, vomiting and sweating were the most common symptoms. The overall incidence of stings was 26.32 per 100,000 inhabitants per year over the study period of eight years (59.21–171.67, 95% CI).
Conclusion: Medical staff should be trained to manage scorpion sting cases, with an emphasis on effective analgesia in most cases. Prospective recording of adequate medical histories should be established. Evaluation of the currently used antivenom is also a priority.
Keywords: Scorpions, Palestinian Territories, West Bank, seasonality, clinical symptoms, children
Citation: Handal EN, Abu Serhan M, Qumsiyeh MB, Bani Hani R, Warrell DA, Amr ZS. Epidemiology of scorpion stings in the West Bank, Palestinian Territories. East Mediterr Health J. 2023;29(12):xxx–xxx. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.23.118
Received: 29/10/22; Accepted: 01/06/23
Copyright © Authors 2023; Licensee: World Health Organization. EMHJ is an open access journal. This paper is available under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo ).
Introduction
Scorpionism (scorpion sting envenoming) is an endemic public health concern in many Arab Middle Eastern countries (1). Our knowledge of scorpion stings in the Palestinian Territories is very limited.
Wahbeh (2) reported scorpion stings among children in Ramallah area with a total of five fatalities. Dudin et al. (3) described the clinical symptoms associated with scorpion stings among children in the Jerusalem area. Sawalha et al. (4) recorded 154 scorpion stings from Nablus Governorate without clinical or epidemiological data. The annual report for 2020 issued by the Palestine Ministry of Health reported 500 scorpion stings with 34.2% of the cases from Jericho and the Jordan Valley (5). Adawi et al. (6) studied the epidemiology of scorpion stings reported in 2014–2015 in the Salfit District.
At least 10 species of scorpion belonging to three families were reported from the West Bank of the Palestinian Territories. The family Buthidae is represented by seven species (Androctonus crassicauda, Androctonus bicolor, Birulatus israelensis, Compsobuthus werneri, Hottentotta judaicus, Leiurus hebraeus and Orthochirus scrobiculosus); family Diplocentridae by one species (Nebo hierichonticus); and family Scorpionidae by two species (Scorpio fuscus and Scorpio palmatus) (1,7). Hottentotta judaicus is a strictly Mediterranean species known in wooded areas, while A. crassicauda has been found in arid areas, especially in the Jordan Valley. Leiurus hebraeus is confined to arid Mediterranean areas and to parts of the Jordan Valley (7). Representative taxa are shown in Figure 1.
[Add Figure 1 near here]
The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of scorpion stings encountered in four districts in the Palestinian Territories in 2012 and 2014–2020 in the interest of evaluating the public health importance of a neglected cause of distressing symptoms, especially in children.
Methods
IRB approval was granted by the Office of the Dean of Research, responsible for Research Ethics Committee (Institutional Review Board) at Bethlehem University. Records were obtained and retrospectively analysed for 2012 and 2014–2020 from the main hospitals in four districts in the Palestinian Territories: Bethlehem: Al-Hussein Governmental Hospital; Hebron: Princess Alia Governmental Hospital; Jericho: Jericho Governmental Hospital; and Salfit: Salfit Governmental Hospital (see Table 1).
[Add Table 1 near here]
No data were available for 2013 because the data gathering system was not functioning in the ministry’s hospitals and clinics in that year. Gender, age and date of admission were available for all patients, but the site of the sting and clinical symptoms were recorded in only 723 and 405 cases, respectively. Hospitals included in this study serve all major towns, villages and refugee camps within the vicinity of each district.
Data were analysed using SPSS version 17 (SPSS, Chicago). A chi-squared test was used for comparison of qualitative data, and a t-test was used for qualitative analysis.
Results
A total of 2175 cases of scorpion stings were reported from four districts in the Palestinian Territories in 2012 and 2014–2020. The highest number of cases was reported from Hebron District, and the lowest from Salfit District (see Table 1). Male to female ratio was 1.26:1 and was statistically significant (P <0.004, 0.54–0.58, 95% CI). The median age was 20 years and the average age and standard deviation (±SD) for both sexes was 24.7±17.5 years (22.7±16.5 and 27.1±18.4 years for males and females, respectively).
Most stings occurred between the ages of one and 20 years (P <0.001, 0.91–0.93, 95% CI), constituting 51.3% of total cases; 47.2% of all studied cases were under the age of 18 (i.e. children, as defined by WHO); and 19.1% occurred in people 40 years old or older (see Figure 2). Among males, most stings occurred between the ages of one and 20 years (P <0.001, 0.07–0.03, 95% CI). Among those aged 20 years and older, there was no statistical difference between males and females.
[Add Figure 2 near here]
Most of the cases were reported during the summer months (32.6%), between June and October, with a peak in July–August (P <0.01, 0.17–0.20, 95% CI), while the lowest numbers of recorded cases were in January and December, at 1.2% and 1.8%, respectively (see Figure 3). Seasonal differences affected males and females similarly (P <0.135, 0.12–0.15, 95% CI).
[Add Figure 3 near here]
Table 2 and Figure 4 show the frequency of stings according to the affected body part in 723 cases. By site, the right hand was stung most commonly in both sexes (P <0.001, 0.43–0.54, 95% CI) followed by the right foot, whereas the chest, buttocks and scrotum were the least affected sites.
[Add Table 2 and Figure 4 near here]
The duration of hospital stay varied from less than six hours to three days. There were no fatalities. Administration of scorpion antivenom (one to seven ampoules) was documented in 344 cases. The only available antivenom in hospitals is Scorpion Venom Antiserum IHS (VINS BIO Products, India).
Clinical data were obtained for 405 cases from all hospitals included in the study (see Table 3). Unfortunately, since neither the species nor any other distinguishing feature, such as colour or size, of the scorpion involved was mentioned, symptoms or severity of envenoming cannot be attributed to a particular species. Pain, vomiting and sweating were the most commonly observed symptoms.
[Add Table 3 near here]
Table 4 shows the incidence per 100 000 inhabitants by governorate. Jericho Governorate had the highest incidence of scorpion sting encounters, followed by Bethlehem Governorate. The lowest incidence was reported from Salfit Governorate and highest from Hebron area. The overall incidence was 26.32 per 100 000 inhabitants over the study period of eight years (P <0.0067, 59.21–171.67, 95% CI).
[Add Table 4 near here]
Discussion
Our data reveal a high incidence of scorpion stings in the districts served by the four participating hospitals, with an average of 26.32 cases per 100 000 inhabitants per year over an eight-year period (see Table 4). However, incidence varied considerably. Jericho had an incidence 10 times higher than districts like Hebron and Salfit. The reason is probably that Jericho District is situated in the Jordan Valley below sea level, with a warmer, semi-tropical climate, and is predominantly rural where most people are engaged in agriculture. This biogeographical zone harbours two highly venomous species: A. crassicauda and L. hebraeus but fewer less-dangerous Mediterranean wooded-area species like Scorpio (7). On the other hand, Hebron District has the highest population (696 599) and largest area (997 km2) in the West Bank.
Scorpion stings appear to be a common problem in the Palestinian Territories. The terrain of these districts provides a suitable habitat for scorpions, and many people are engaged in agriculture in this rural landscape and so are exposed to scorpion stings. The seasonal pattern for scorpion stings is similar to that reported from Salfit District (6) and neighbouring countries such as Saudi Arabia (8) and Jordan (9). Males were more likely to be stung than females (6,8,10). This is due to their greater exposure while working in the fields as adults or playing in open areas as children.
Stings on the hands (36.7%) were the most common. This is probably the result of inadvertent handling of scorpions while picking vegetables or other objects. In Saudi Arabia, the lower extremities and especially the feet (10, 11), fingers and hands (12), and feet (45%) and hands (24%) (11) were variously reported to be most affected. In Jordan, fingers and toes were stung most often (10).
Associated clinical symptoms are similar to those described by several authors in Jordan, the Palestinian Territories and Saudi Arabia (6,10,11,13,15). Dudin et al. (3) give a comprehensive account of clinical symptoms associated with scorpion stings among children in the Jerusalem area.
Although substantial numbers of scorpion stings were recorded during the study period, the symptoms recorded were mostly consistent with a Class II classification: minor manifestations (non-life threatening), according to Khattabi et al. (14), namely, vomiting, sweating, nausea, priapism, salivation and tachycardia. Only eight patients had dyspnoea, suggesting a Class III classification: severe manifestations (life threatening), and no fatalities were reported. Dudin et al. (3) reported two fatal cases among children in the Jerusalem area who had not received antivenom intravenously.
In the Palestinian Territories, the only antivenom available is Scorpion Venom Antiserum IHS manufactured in India by VINS BIO Products. The antivenom is specific for L. quinquestriatus and A. amoreuxi, neither of which species occurs in the Palestinian Territories. Paraspecificity is claimed by the manufacturer against Androctonus crassicauda, A. aeneas, A. australis, Scorpio marus [sic] palmatus and Buthus occitanus. In our study, 344 (15.8% of the total cases) patients, most of them children, received this antivenom, but there was no information about effectiveness or adverse events.
Although few severe cases and no fatalities were identified in this study, the most common management problem faced by medical staff is effective analgesia, especially in children. The official management recommendations for scorpion stings and their application by health personnel in the Palestinian Territories follow global recommendations, including using drugs like Prazosin in severe cases. Yet, there seems to be a lack of awareness among health providers about proper treatment, and ignorance of which species of scorpions are of medical importance. This can and should be addressed by training medical staff. The drugs currently available should be reevaluated for local efficacy since other sources of specific antivenoms for the local species are available, for example in Saudi Arabia.
Conclusions
Scorpion stings are a problem faced frequently by medical staff in the Palestinian Territories, especially in areas like Jericho District. They affect both sexes and particularly children. Most of the cases were reported during the summer period (with a peak in July–August). The right hand was most commonly stung in both sexes. Management guidelines for scorpion sting cases, especially for child victims, and prospective protocols for data collection should be established.
Authors’ contributions
Elias N. Handal and Mohammad Abu Serhan collected and tabulated the data from hospitals. Rihan Bani Hani performed the statistical analysis. Mazin B. Qumsiyeh, David A. Warrell and Zuhair S. Amr drafted the manuscript. David A. Warrell critically revised the manuscript. David A. Warrell and Mazin B. Qumsiyeh are guarantors of the paper.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the staff of the Palestine Institute for Biodiversity and Sustainability for their support. Our gratitude is extended to the Palestinian Ministry of Health for facilitating data collection. The ethics committee approval was received.
Funding
This study was partially funded by the European Union (ENI/2019/412-148: Unity and Diversity in Nature and Society) under the Biodiversity Center and the Ministry of Education of Palestine (for the Medical Zoology Unit).
Competing interests
None declared.
Ethical approval
Not required.
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
1. Amr ZS, Abu Baker MA, Al-Saraireh M, Warrell AD. Scorpions and scorpion sting envenoming (scorpionism) in the Arab Countries of the Middle East. Toxicon. 2021;191: 83–103. PMID: 33387549
2. Wahbeh Y. Scorpion stings in children. Jordan Medical Journal. 1965;1: 57–61.
3. Dudin AA, Rambaud-Cousson A, Thalji A, Juabeh II, Abu-Libdeh B. Scorpion sting in children in the Jerusalem area: a review of 54 cases. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics. 1991;11(3):217–223. PMID: 1719920
4. Sawalha AF, Sweileh WM, Tufaha MT, Al-Jabi DY. Analysis of the pattern of acute poisoning in patients admitted to a governmental hospital in Palestine. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2010;107(5):914–918. PMID: 20533924
5. Palestine Ministry of Health 2021. Annual Report for 2020 (in Arabic). www.moh.ps.
6. Adawi SHAA, Adawi SHAA., Adawi DHAA. The scorpion sting: epidemiology, clinical symptoms, treatment, surveillance and reporting obstacles in the Salfit District (West Bank) (2014-2015). International Journal of tropical disease and Health. 2016;14(3):1-10.
7. Qumsiyeh M, Salman I, Salsaa M, Amr Z. Records of scorpions from the Palestinian Territories, with the first chromosomal data (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Zoology in the Middle East. 2013;59:70–76.
8. Al Asmari AK, Al Zahrani AG, Al Jowhary S, Arshaduddin M. Clinical aspects and frequency of scorpion stings in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 2012;33(8):852–858. PMID: 22886117
9. Amr ZS, Al Zou’bi R, Abdo N, Bani Hani R. Scorpion Stings in Jordan: An Update. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 2017;28(3): 207–212. PMID: 28689960
10. Amr ZS. Scorpionism and Dangerous Species of Jordan. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Schwartz EF, Vega RCR, de la Possani LD (Eds.). Scorpion Venoms. Springer, Dordrecht, 2015; 181–200.
11. Groshong TD. Scorpion envenomation in eastern Saudi Arabia. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1993;22(9):1431–1437. PMID: 8103309
12. Dittrich K, Power AP, Smith NA. Scorpion sting syndrome – a ten year experience. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 1995;15(2):148–155. PMID: 17587926
13. Neale RJ. Scorpion Sting Syndrome in Eastern Riyadh. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 1990;10(4), 383–388
14. Khattabi A, Soulaymani-Bencheikh R, Achour S, Salmi LR. Classification of clinical consequences of scorpion stings: consensus development. Scorpion Consensus Expert Group. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2011;105(7):364–369. PMID: 21601228
15. Ismail SA. Clinical patterns of scorpion stings at El-Quawayah General Hospital Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 1995;16: 312–314.