Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal | All issues | Volume 3, 1997 | Volume 3, issue 3 | Epidemiological and sociocultural study of burn patients in Alexandria, Egypt

Epidemiological and sociocultural study of burn patients in Alexandria, Egypt

Print

PDF version

Ashraf F. Attia, Aida A. Sherif, Ahmed M. Mandil, M. Nabil Massoud, Mervat W. Abou-Nazel and Moustafa A. Arafa

ABSTRACT: All burn cases admitted to the burns unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital over a period of one year were investigated. Burns were found to occur in younger age groups. There was an almost equal distribution of cases by sex, but when stratified by age, more females were found in most age groups. Most burns were domestic, with cooking being the most prevalent activity. Flame was the most common agent. Death occurred in about one-third of cases; when using logistic regression analysis, the outcome of the burn injury was significantly associated with age, sex, total surface area burnt and degree and depth of the burn.

Etude épidémiologique et socioculturelle des brûlés à Alexandrie (Egypte)

Résumé: Tous les cas de brûlures admis au Service des brûlés de l'Hôpital universitaire d'Alexandrie sur une période d'un an ont été examinés. Il a été constaté que les brûlures se produisaient dans les groupes d'âge les plus jeunes. Il y avait une répartition presque égale des cas en fonction du sexe, mais lorsqu'une stratification par âge a été effectuée, on a trouvé davantage de femmes dans la plupart des groupes d'âge. La plupart des brûlures étaient d'origine domestique, la cuisine étant l'activité impliquée dans la majorité des cas. L'agent le plus souvent en cause était le feu. Le décès est survenu dans environ un tiers des cas; lorsqu'on utilise l'analyse de régression logistique, l'issue de la brûlure est associée de manière significative avec l'âge, le sexe, la surface totale des lésions ainsi que le degré de brûlure et la profondeur de la brûlure.

Introduction

Injuries represent one of the most important public health problems facing both developing and industrialized nations today. Injuries may be either intentional or non- intentional; but intent is sometimes difficult to determine for injuries such as burns.

Burns represent an extremely stressful experience for both the burn victims as well as their families. An extensive burn profoundly affects the patient's physique, psyche, financial situation and family. Patients with extensive burns frequently die, and for those with lesser injury, physical recovery is slow and painful. In addition to their dramatic physical effects, burn injuries frequently cause deleterious psychological complications.

As the etiological factors of burn injuries vary considerably in different communities, careful analysis of the epidemiological features in every community is needed before a sound prevention programme can be planned and implemented. This study was conducted to identify demographic and sociocultural aspects of burn patients, to investigate the factors affecting outcome and mortality of burns and to determine the magnitude of the problem of burns among all injuries admitted to the Alexandria Main University Hospital over a period of one year.

Subjects and methods

All burn cases admitted to the burns unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital over a period of one year (n = 533) were subjected to a questionnaire-interview to obtain the following data:

Registration data: age, sex, residence, level of education, occupation, marital status, crowding index (number of persons per number of habitable rooms) and income.

Circumstances of the injury: place and time, brief description of the event, agent, associated burning of clothes, patient's and attendants' reaction, first-aid measures taken.

Clinical assessment of the wound: site affected, total surface area burnt (TSAB), degree, depth, severity, complications.

Chronological data: dates of admission and discharge.

The data were obtained by questionnaire-interview with the patient themselves, if they were mature and well enough to answer the questions. In the case of younger children or patients who were not well enough as a result of severe injury, the data were obtained from relatives who attended the unit. It should be noted that visits to patients admitted to the unit are forbidden but visitors can make a phone call to patients from the social workers' office within the unit. The visitors may inquire about the patients' condition through the social workers, the nursing staff and/or the unit's doctor.

The total number of burn cases throughout the study year were compared with the total number of all injuries admitted during the same period to determine the proportion of burn injuries among them. The total number of all injuries was obtained through revision of the data from the registries of the Emergency Unit, the Statistics Department and the Alexandria Poison Centre.

Data analysis

The data were entered into Epi-Info on computer and subsequently exported to SPSS. The relationship between mortality and selected indicators from data of the patients' profiles was studied using multivariate logistic regression analysis and hierarchical log-linear analysis.

Logistic regression analysis can explain a significant amount of the variation in the patient factors studied. The following variables were used to develop the model: age and sex, agent of the burn, delay in seeking medical care, TSAB, degree and depth of the burn wound, occurrence of complications, clothing ignition and intent of the injury. The percentage of cases correctly classified is used as a measure of the goodness of fit of the model.

Hierarchical log-linear analysis is a method of finding the best linear association of a set of categorical variables which can represent data, where the natural logs of cell frequencies rather than the actual count are used. The value of the standardized residual is considered to be significant when it ranges from -1.96 to +1.96. The best model which described our data included the following variables: condition on discharge, age and sex of the burn patient and TSAB.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics (Table 1)

The ages of the burn patients ranged from 6 months to 81 years ( = 22.95 ±16.7 years); most of the cases (86.7%) were ≤ 40 years of age. Differences in age distribution by sex were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Among patients of the age of education (6 years and above; n = 413), about one-third were illiterate; those who were university graduates represented only 3.6%. Females were found more often among the illiterate group, while more males were found among primary, secondary and university graduates. However, the association was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

The majority of patients (67.2%) were not working. Of those, 31% were below school age, 25% were students, 41% were housewives and 3.2% were retired. Of the working group, more than half of the patients were manual workers, followed by technical workers (29%); clerical, commercial and professional workers represented a total of about 17%. More females (64%) were found in the married group and more males (63%) in the single group. Differences in marital status by sex were statistically highly significant.

The crowding index ranged from 0.2 to 9.0 ( = 2.4 ± 1.1).

Circumstances of the injury (Table 2)

The majority of burn injuries (91.4%) occurred in the home. The place of occurrence of the injury and sex were found to be significantly associated; the vast majority (93%) of occupational and street burns occurred among males. More than half of domestic cases (56.9%) occurred in the kitchen; those which occurred in the bathroom represented 20.4%. Cooking was the activity most often responsible for burn occurrence (63.5%).

Regarding seasonal distribution, more cases were encountered during the summer and spring (29.6% and 27.8% respectively). The association between season and occupation was not significant.

Flame represented the most common agent of burn injuries (66.8%) and tended to affect more females than males; kerosene stoves were the most common source (53.2%). The agent and the place of occurrence of the burn injury were significantly associated; most flame, scald and electrical burns (94.9%, 95.0% and 61.9% respectively) were domestic, while most chemical burns (56.3%) occurred in the street. Most of the burns in the age group < 10 years were by scalding (76.3%), while flame was the most common agent in other age groups. Clothing ignition was reported in 82.9% of flame burn patients and 61% of them were females. Among those with clothing ignition, 71% were wearing clothing made of synthetic material, 20% had clothes soiled with flammable liquids and 51% were wearing tight clothing.

Clinical assessment of the burn wound (Table 3)

Most cases were either mixed second and third degree burns or isolated second degree (49.2% and 44.3% respectively). The burn agent was significantly associated with the degree, depth and severity of the burn wound; flame burns tended to cause mixed second and third degree, deep and severe burns. A significant association was found between the occurrence of clothing ignition and depth of the burn.

Outcome and factors affecting mortality

The length of hospital stay ranged from 0.2 to 138 days ( = 16.2 ± 19.5 days). For survivors, the mean length of stay was 21.5 days (±21.7), while that for those who died was 5.3 days (±5.1).The case fatality rate was 33%. Mortality was significantly associated with age and sex of the burn victim, TSAB, agent, occurrence of clothing ignition, degree, depth and severity of the burn wound, delay in seeking medical care and occurrence of inhalation burns.

When logistic regression analysis was applied, it was found that age, sex, TSAB and degree and depth of burn were significantly associated with mortality (Table 4). The percentage of cases correctly classified was found to be 94.7%.

Using hierarchical log-linear analysis, it appears from the model that the case fatality rate significantly increased with increased TSAB and at the extremes of age (Table 5). As regards sex, it was found that in all TSAB groups and among all age groups, the male:female ratio ranged from 1:1.1 to 1:5.0, except for those who had 0%-20% TSAB where the male:female ratio in the age group 0-10 years was 1.5:1.

Discussion

Injuries and their related morbidity, disability and mortality represent a public health problem of increasing importance in developing countries. Economic development coupled with a remarkable decrease in the infectious disease rate have increased the importance of injuries as a leading cause of premature death and disability in such countries [1,2]. Epidemiological studies of morbidity are a prerequisite for effective burn prevention programmes, both because each population seems to have its own epidemiological characteristics and because knowledge of the epidemiology of burns is needed to select target groups for preventive actions.

Age and sex are important epidemiological determinants for injuries, including burns. The present study revealed that about one-fifth of the studied sample was

This pattern means that burns tend to occur more in certain age groups reflecting the particular developmental or behavioural patterns associated with age. In children, the lack of coordination and unawareness of dangerous substances play important roles in the occurrence of burns. In addition, young children are not adequately supervised because of large families and the lack of domestic safety measures. High incidence among young adults, on the other hand, may be explained by the fact that they are generally active and exposed to hazardous situations both at home and at work.

As regards sex distribution, the female preponderance in the age group 20-40 years concurs with other reports from developing countries such as India [6] and Jordan [7], as well as other Egyptian studies [8,9], and might be explained by the involvement of females of this age group in domestic activities. On the other hand, the male predominance in the younger age group (5-10 years) might be explained by the inquisitive and exploring nature of boys of this age. This finding concurs with other reports from different countries [6,10,11], as well as from Egypt [9,12]. In industrialized countries, the sex distribution of burn cases differs, where males generally have a significantly higher risk [5,13]. This might be explained by the higher incidence of industrial and recreational burns among males in such countries.

With regard to seasonal distribution of cases, summer had the highest percentage (29.6%), followed by spring (27.8%) but the seasonal difference was statistically insignificant. This finding is in agreement with an earlier study performed in Alexandria [9].

With respect to the place where the burn injury occurred, the majority of burns (91.4%) occurred in the home. This figure is comparable to other reports from developing countries, including Egypt. In Egypt, the reported figures [1,9,14] range from 75% to 84%. Other reports from South Africa [15], India [16], Nigeria [17] and Ghana [18] have figures ranging from 71% to 92%. Reports from industrialized countries indicate that domestic burns are also the commonest, as reported in the USA (46.1%)[19]. However, figures from industrialized countries are clearly lower than those reported from developing countries. This may be due to the relatively higher percentage of occupational and recreational burns or to better home safety with safer cooking and heating devices in industrialized countries.

In the present study, most burns were unintentional (89.1%); suicidal and homicidal injuries represented 4.3% and 2.6% respectively. These figures are comparable to an earlier study in Alexandria [9], where unintentional burns represented 85.3% of the cases. The percentage of confirmed suicides in the present study is similar to that reported in India (4%) [20], but lower than that reported in Jordan (13.5%) [21]. It was found that most of the cases of undetermined intent followed the pattern of suicidal intent as regards time of occurrence, agent of the burn and TSAB. Thus, if the figures for suicidal injuries (4.3%) and undetermined intent (3.9%) were added together, this would come to about 8.3%, which is closer to the figure reported by Kamel in Egypt [9].

Considering the agent of the burn injury, flame was the most common agent, affecting about two-thirds of cases, followed by scalds (26.3%). Similar results have been reported from Egypt [9,14], India [20] and Jordan [21]. As regards the source of flame, portable pressure kerosene stoves were the most common source and were responsible for slightly more than half (53.2%) of the cases. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies in developing countries [15,16], as well as in Egypt [8,9]. On the other hand, the picture reported from industrialized countries differs, where flammable liquids and gas stoves were the most common source of flame burns [19,22]. Burn agents are highly individualized in each country, largely depending on the standard of living and lifestyle.

In spite of the finding that scalds were responsible for only 26.3% of burn injuries in this sample, they were found to be the most frequent agent of burn injuries in reports from Japan [23] and Nigeria [24], in which they represented 40%-78%. The difference in ranking of different agents could be attributed to the developmental stage of the country, the age composition of the sample and whether outpatients were included or not.

In the present study, a significant association was found between age and agent of burn injury. Most scald burns (76.5%) occurred in children £10 years, while in the older age groups flame was the most common agent. These results are in agreement with those reported from Australia [25], Jordan [21] and Egypt [8,9,12]. Associated clothing ignition was identified in 83% of flame cases. Clothing ignition has been identified as a major cause of burns in both industrialized and developing countries. However, in industrialized countries, a change to more closely fitting styles of clothing, together with decreased fabric flammability, has resulted in a significant decrease in deaths from clothing ignition, which represented only 5% of all burn deaths in the USA [26].

Mortality is the most important and most readily quantifiable outcome in burn patients. In the present study, the case fatality rate was 33%. When univariate analysis was used, a higher case fatality rate was observed with older age groups, with flame agent, especially if clothing was ignited, with larger TSAB, with deep burns and with higher degree, especially if the patients delayed seeking hospital admission. These results are consistent with other reports [27,28].

When applying logistic regression analysis to a model of 10 variables which were significantly associated with mortality, five factors were found to be significantly different between the survivors and those who died. These variables were age, sex, TSAB, degree and depth of burn. The accuracy of the model used was 94.7% which is comparable to other models [27-29]. Multivariate regression analysis for burns mortality prediction in other studies has identified similar independent variables. TSAB was found significant in some models [29-31], while age was significant in other models [30-32]. Sex was significant in one model [34]. The depth and degree were significant in these models but they were used in conjugation with TSAB, presenting it as percentage full thickness burn and percentage partial thickness burn. The variability of these results may indicate differences in treatment protocols, which influence ultimate mortality [27].

With regard to the contribution of burn injuries to all injuries admitted to Alexandria Main University Hospital during the study period, burns were responsible for 5.6% of all admitted injuries. This figure is comparable to others from Egypt, as well as other countries, which range from 4% to 20% [33-36]. However, the actual condition may be worse as the figure does not include cases which may have died before they reached hospital. In addition, the relatively low percentage of cases compared with other reports may be due to the non-inclusion of mild cases, which were treated on an outpatient basis. Although burn patients may appear numerically few, they comprise a patient group often requiring considerable resources because of the need for repeated grafting procedures, hygienic precautions, treatment of infections and supportive care to patients and their families.

References

  1. Mashaly AM, Graitcer PL, Youssef ZM. Injury in Egypt: injury as a public health problem. Cairo, 1993.
  2. McLoughlin E, McGuire A. The causes, cost and prevention of childhood burns injuries. American journal of diseases of children, 1990, 144:677-83.
  3. Subrahmanyam M. Topical application of honey in treatment of burns. British journal of surgery, 1991, 78:497-8.
  4. Ytterstad B, Sogaard AJ. The Harstad Injury Prevention Study: prevention of burns in small children by a community-based intervention. Burns, 1995, 21(4):259-66.
  5. Glasheen WP et al. Identification of the high risk population for serious burn injuries. Burns, 1983, 9(3):193-200.
  6. Sen R, Banerjec C. Survey of 1000 admissions to a burns unit, SSKM Hospital, Calcutta. Burns, 1981, 7(5):357-60.
  7. Abu Ragheb S, Qaryoute S, el-Muhtaseb H. Mortality of burn injuries in Jordan. Burns, 1984, 10(6):439-43.
  8. Massoud MN, Mandil AMA. Towards a burns prevention programme for children and adolescents in Alexandria. Alexandria journal of pediatrics, 1992, 6(3):641-5.
  9. Kamel FA. Some epidemiological features of burn patients admitted to the emergency department of the Main University Hospital and to Ras El-Teen Hospital in Alexandria [MPH thesis]. Alexandria, Egypt, University of Alexandria, 1987.
  10. Eadie PA, Williams R, Dickson WA. Thirty-five years of paediatric scalds: are lessons being learned? British journal of plastic surgery, 1995, 48:103-5.
  11. Green AR, Fairclough J, Sykes PJ. Epidemiology of burns in childhood. Burns, 1984, 10(5):368-71.
  12. Etiba AH et al. Burns and scalds among school-aged children in Alexandria. Bulletin of the High Institute of Public Health, 1984, 14(4):227-40.
  13. Duggan D, Quine S. Burn injuries and characteristics of burn patients in New South Wales, Australia. Burns, 1995, 21(2):83-9.
  14. El-Sonbaty MA, El-Oteify M. Epidemiology of burns in Assiut province during the last two years. Assiut medical journal, 1990, 14:106-9.
  15. de Kock M. The Cape Town burn profile. Burns, 1978, 5(2):210-1.
  16. Jha SS. Burns mortality in Bombay. Burns, 1981, 8(2):118-22.
  17. Adesunkanmi K, Oyelami OA. The pattern and outcome of burn injuries at Wesley Guild Hospital, Ilesha, Nigeria: a review of 156 cases. Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 1994, 97:108-12.
  18. Forjuoh SN, Guyer B, Smith GS. Childhood burns in Ghana: epidemiological characteristics and home-based treatment. Burns, 1995, 21(1):24-8.
  19. Jay KM. Burn epidemiology: a basis for burn prevention. Journal of trauma, 1977, 17(12):943-7.
  20. Malla CN et al. Analytical study of burns in Kashmir. Burns, 1983, 9(3):180-3.
  21. El-Muhtaseb H, Qaryoute S, Abu Ragheb S. Burn injuries in Jordan: a study of 338 cases. Burns, 1983, 10(2):116-20.
  22. Pegg SP et al. Epidemiology of burns attending a casualty department in Brisbane. Burns, 1983, 9(6):416-21.
  23. Nagasaki T. Statistical analysis of burnt at Nagasaki Hospital in Hiroshima. Burns, 1978, 5(1):60-1.
  24. Onuba O. Pattern of burn injury in Nigerian children. Tropical doctor, 1989, 18:106-8.
  25. Pegg SP, Hinckley VM, Adiseshan N. Adult burns. A three-year survey with assessment of sulphamylon. Medical journal of Australia, 1972, 1:350.
  26. Byrom RR et al. Epidemiology of flame burn injuries. Burns, 1984, 11(1):1-10.
  27. Bowser BH et al. Statistical methods to predict morbidity and mortality: self-assessment techniques for burn units. Burns, 1983, 9:319-26.
  28. Scott-Conner CEH et al. Quantitation of rate of wound closure and the prediction of death following major burns. Burns, 1988, 14:373-8.
  29. Wong MK, Ngim RCK. Burns mortality and hospitalization timea prospective statistical study of 352 patients in an Asian national burn centre. Burns, 1995, 21(1):39-46.
  30. Benita-Ruiz I et al. An analysis of burn mortality: a report from a Spanish regional burn centre. Burns, 1991, 17:201-4.
  31. Shirani KZ, Pruitt BA, Mason AD. The influence of inhalation injury and pneumonia on burn mortality. Annals of surgery, 1986, 205:82-7.
  32. Roi LD, Flora JD, Davis TM. Two new burn severity indices. Journal of trauma, 1983, 23:1023-9.
  33. Boutros SG. Health statistics. Ministry of Health. Personal communication, 1991.
  34. Mock CN et al. Admissions for injury at a rural hospital in Ghana: implications for prevention in the developing world. American journal of public health, 1995, 85(7):927-31.
  35. Scannell G, Waxman K, Tominaga GT. Respiratory distress in traumatized and burned children. Journal of pediatric surgery, 1995, 30(4):612-4.
  36. Langley J. Description and classification of childhood burns. Burns, 1984, 10(4):231-5.