|
Anopheles arabiensis: abundance and insecticide resistance in an irrigated area of eastern Sudan Y.E. Himeidan1, M.Y. Dukeen2, El-A. El-Rayah2 and I. Adam3
1University of Kassala, Kassala,
Sudan. |
| |
| Volume 10, Nos 1/2, January / March 2004, Pages 167 - 174 |
توافر الأنوفيلة العربية ومقاومتها للمبيدات في منطقة مرويَّة في شرق السودانيوسف الصافي حمدان، مصطفى دكين، الأمين الرياح، إسحاق آدم الخلاصـة: درس توافر الأنوفيلة العربية ومدى تأثرها بالمبيدات في منطقة حلفا الجديدة، شرق السودان، خلال الفترة من آذار/مارس 1999 وحزيران/يونيو 2000. ومن بين الإناث من الأنوفيلات التي تم جمعها والتي بلغ عددها 4854 كان 4847 منها (99.9%) من الأنوفيلات العربية، فيما كان 7 منها (0.1%) من الأنوفيلات الفرعونية. إن الإناث من الأنوفيلات العربية تواصل سرأها (تكاثرها) طيلة العام، مع فصلين للسرء الكثيف، أحدهما خلال الفصل المطير (حيث وجدت 158.4 أنثى/اليوم/الغرفة مع 84.7 من اليرقات في كل عشر غمسات) والثاني خلال فصل الري (حيث وجد 136.8 من الإناث/اليوم/ الغرفة مع 44.8 من اليرقات في كل عشر غمسات). وكان متوسط نشاط العض 28.8 عضة/شخص/ليلة، وتتوزع العضات على مدار الليل، وبشكل خاص خارج المنزل. وقد كان معدل تأثر الأنوفيلات العربية بالد.د.ت 97.8% وبالملاثيون 96.3% وبالفينيتريون 100%. إن الأنوفيلة العربية هي الناقل الوحيد للملاريا في المنطقة، وهي ذات نشاط يستمر كامل العام ولا يقتصر على فصل دون آخر. |
|
ABSTRACT The abundance of Anopheles arabiensis and its susceptibility to insecticides was studied in New Halfa, eastern Sudan, from March 1999 to June 2000. Of 4854 females anophelines collected, 4847 (99.9%) were An. arabiensis and 7 (0.1%) An. pharoensis. Female An. arabiensis were breeding throughout the year, with 2 peak densities, during the rainy (158.4 females/room/day and 84.7 larvae/10 dips) and irrigated seasons (136.8 females/room/day and 44.8 larvae/10 dips). The mean biting activity was 28.8 bites/person/night, found throughout the night, mainly outdoors. Susceptibility of An. arabiensis to insecticides dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT), malathion and fenitrothion was 97.8%, 96.3% and 100% respectively. An. arabiensis is the sole malaria vector in the area and is perennial rather than seasonal. Anopheles arabiensis : abondance et résistance aux insecticides dans une zone irriguée du Soudan oriental RESUME L’abondance d’Anopheles arabiensis et sa sensibilité aux insecticides ont fait l’objet d’une étude à New Halfa (Soudan oriental) de mars 1999 à juin 2000. Sur 4854 anophèles femelles récoltées, 4847 (99,9 %) appartenaient à l’espèce An. arabiensis et 7 (0,1 %) à An. pharoensis. Les femelles An. arabiensis se reproduisaient toute l’année, avec 2 pics de densité, pendant la saison des pluies (158,4 femelles/pièce/jour et 84,7 larves/10 prélèvements) et la saison d’irrigation (136,8 femelles/pièce/jour et 44,8 larves/10 prélèvements). La densité agressive moyenne était de 28,8 piqûres/personne/nuit, constatée pendant toute la nuit, principalement à l’extérieur. La sensibilité d’An. arabiensis aux insecticides dichloro-diphényl-trichloroéthane (DDT), malathion et fénitrothion était de 97,8 %, 96,3 % et 100 % respectivement. An. arabiensis est le seul vecteur du paludisme dans la région et la transmission y est pérenne plutôt que saisonnière. IntroductionMalaria is a major health problem in the tropical countries, especially sub-Saharan Africa, where about 90% of the clinical cases occur. There are nearly 500 million clinical cases of malaria worldwide each year and 1.1 to 2.7 million people die annually [1]. The Anopheles gambiae complex is the main malaria vector [2]. In Sudan, malaria constitutes around 40% of all infectious diseases and Plasmodium falciparum is the predominant species, which is responsible for over 90% of the infections [3]. The spread of drug-resistant P. falciparum strains worldwide has hampered the control of malaria, and vector control remains the best approach for protecting the community against malaria [4]. An. arabiensis is the major malaria vector reported from all parts of the country, co-existing with An. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and An. funestus in southern Sudan [5–8]. Vector control by chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides was started in Sudan in 1948, when dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) sprayed with oil was used as a residual indoor insecticide. Thereafter, organized control by these chemicals was initiated in 1950/51 in the Gezira scheme (central Sudan) but by the early 1970s, resistance to DDT was reported. Thereafter, the organophosphate insecticides malathion and fenitrothion replaced DDT [9,10]. Understanding the behaviour of the malaria vectors and their abundance is essential for malaria control operations. Furthermore, understanding the resting, biting and breeding habits of the vectors and their susceptibility to insecticides is extremely important for planning, implementing and monitoring vector control measures. The objective of this study was to establish this data for the New Halfa area of Sudan. MethodsStudy area The study was carried out at 2 localities (Dibaira camp and Heielmasakine) in the north and south of New Halfa town, an area which is surrounded by freehold farms. The New Halfa area is located in the semi-arid belt of the Sudan approximately 500 km east of Khartoum in the middle of an agricultural scheme. During the study period, the total rainfall was 431.6 mm and the average temperature was 30 °C. P. falciparum is the predominant malaria parasite species, and has been shown to be 75% and 9.6% resistant to chloroquine and quinine respectively [11]. Mosquito collectionHand capture and pyrethrum spray methods were used to make monthly collections of indoor resting mosquitoes during the period March 1999 to June 2000. Collection by hand capture was carried out from 06:00 to 08:00 hours. Two collectors spent about 10–15 minutes in each hut (total 10 huts) using a torch, aspirators and paper cups to search for resting anopheline mosquitoes. Then 0.3% pyrethrum in kerosene was sprayed and knocked-down mosquitoes were collected from 08:00 to 10:00 hours. Females collected were classified as according to their blood meal stages unfed, fed, half-gravid/gravid. The monthly night biting collection was carried out in fixed collection sites during the main transmission season by 2 people (1 indoors and 1 outdoor) sitting from 18:00 to 06:00 hours. Females collected were kept in separate paper cups until identification and dissection for parity determination. The ovaries were dissected to determine the parity rate using the method of Detinova [12]. Blood spots from freshly fed females of An. arabiensis caught by pyrethrum spray catches were harvested on filter paper, the source of each blood determined (human biting index) using the Ouchterlony radial diffusion technique [8]. The surveys of immature stages were carried out from 13:00 to 15:30 hours using a standard dipper. Monthly samples of 100 dips were taken at 10 positive breeding sites selected randomly to cover the whole town. Adult and larvae mosquitoes were identified on a morphological basis using the standard keys [13,14]. Susceptibility testingThe susceptibility of An. arabiensis to DDT, malathion and fenitrothion was examined in 3 locations (Wad el Naeem, Heielmasakine and Umgargoor). According to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations [15], fed females were exposed for 1 hour to 4% DDT, 5% malathion and 1% fenitrothion to determine their susceptibility to these insecticides. Statistical analysisData was entered into a computer database and SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. The difference between variables was evaluated using the chi-squared test. Student t-test was used to evaluate the difference in the density of the vector in the 2 localities and the human biting rate between the outdoor and the indoor sites. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the human biting rates at different times of the night. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. ResultsOut of 4854 females collected, 4847 (99.9%) were An. arabiensis and 7 (0.1%) were An. pharoensis. Most of the An. arabiensis specimens were collected by pyrethrum spray (4164, 85.9%) rather than hand capture (683, 14.1%). The mean vector density in the Heielmasakine area (pyrethrum collection) was 29.3 females/room/day, while it was 23.1 females/room/day in Dibaira camp ( Table 1). The highest density was recorded in September 1999 by the end of the rainy season (158.4 females/room/day) in Heielmasakine while the lowest density in this area was recorded in April 1999 (0.2 females/room/day). The peak density of adults was reflected by the peak of immature stages in the same month (84.7 larvae/10 dips). The lowest density of adult females was recorded in March 2000 (0.4 females/room/day) in Dibaira camp. The lowest density of immature stages was recorded in that month (0.54 larvae/10 dips). A minor peak of female density was recorded during the period of irrigation (March 1999), 136.8 females/room/day in Dibaira camp, coupled with a minor peak of immature stages (44.8 larvae/10 dips) in the same month (Figures 1 and 2).
Of 2132 females collected from indoors resting sites in Dibaira camp, 14.1%, 42.5% and 43.3 % were unfed, fed and half-gravid/gravid respectively. While from Heielmasakine, 14.4%, 36.5% and 49.1% were unfed, fed and half-gravid/gravid. The ratio of fed to gravid/half gravid females in the 2 localities considered together was 1:1.2 in favour of gravid/half-gravid. This indicates that this species is more endophilic than exophilic. A total of 4.1 females/room/day were captured on thatched walls compared with 1.6 females/room/day on mud walls. Of the An. arabiensis females captured while trying to bite human baits, 76.2% were caught outdoors and 23.8% indoors. The average human biting rate during the rainy season was significantly higher for outdoor biting activity (28.8 bites/person/night) than indoors (9.0 bites/person/night) (P < 0.001). The indoor biting activity started initially with a moderate value at 18:00–02:00 hours (0.88 bites/person/hour), followed by a peak of biting activity at 20:00–22:00 (1.13 bites/person/hour) and then dropped to lower activity at 24:00–02:00 (0.25 bites/person/hour). A minor peak was observed at 02:00–06:00 (0.75 bites/person/hour). In contrast, the outdoor biting activity started with a peak value at 18.00–20.00 hours (5.0 bites/person/hour) decreased at 20:00–22:00 to 3.25 bites/person/hour and dropped to lower values (0.25 bites/person/hour) between 02:00–06:00. The difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The monthly parity rates of An. arabiensis during the rainy season were 21.4%, 6.7%, 42.5% and 36.4% in July, August, September and October respectively, with a mean of 32.2% during this period. The human biting index of the 2 localities were 76.4% and 81.1% in Dibaira camp and Heielmasakine respectively, with a mean of 78.7% of the total mosquitoes examined. Out of a total of 3849 larvae collected, 21.1%, 29.2%, 24.6% and 15.7% were first, second, third and fourth instar larvae respectively. Most (82.5%) of these larvae were collected from the shallow sunlit pools resulting from broken water pipes. Other breeding sites were rain pools (11.6%), leakage from irrigation canals (3.1%) and water excavations for human and animal use (2.9%). The mean total number of larvae collected during the study period was 24.3 larvae/10 dips. The susceptibility of An. arabiensis to the 3 insecticides was 97.8%, 96.3% and 100.0% for 4% DDT, 5% malathion and 1% fenitrothion respectively ( Table 2).
DiscussionThis entomological study was conducted in an agricultural area in eastern Sudan, characterized by a high level of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria [11]. An. arabiensis was the main vector (99.9%) found in the area; only 0.1% were An. pharoensis and no other species were detected. This agrees with a previous study from the nearby area (Gedaref) in the eastern Sudan where An. arabiensis was the main vector, besides 2 other species, An. pharoensis and An. funestus [8]. An. arabiensis existed throughout the year with 2 peaks, a major one at the end of the rainy season (September) and the other during the irrigated season of the scheme. The second peak is most likely due to presence of breeding sites that were formed from the puddles of irrigation canals around the area. Thus An. arabiensis has become perennial instead of seasonal because of irrigation and agricultural practices. Similar findings were reported from an irrigated area in the Gezira scheme in central Sudan [16], but unlike our study, a single peak of vector density was observed at the end of the short rainy season that dropped gradually to disappear in the long, hot dry season [8]. The most important factor leading to high breeding density during the rainy season was the optimal temperature (28.9–30.1 °C) and high relative humidity, as it is known that high temperature and low humidity adversely affect adult and immature stages [17]. This trend of mosquito abundance differs from other tropical areas that are characterized by longer rainy seasons and more humid conditions, e.g. southern Sudan and many other African countries. In these regions, anopheline mosquitoes are known to be prevalent throughout the year [18]. Our study showed that An. arabiensis clearly preferred thatched to mud walls as a resting surface. A similar finding was observed from central Ethiopia [19]. In this area An. arabiensis is strongly exophagic. This finding is supported by the previous study in Gedaref state and central Ethiopia [8,19]. Three factors seem to determine the biting cycle of the An. arabiensis: rhythmic activity of the mosquitoes, the microclimate and human habits [20]. Winds and temperature are the climatic factors affecting the peaks of the biting cycle [18]. In the Zwai area of central Ethiopia the peak of outdoor biting occurred from 22:00 to 24:00 hours, whereas the peak of indoor biting took place early in the evening from 18:00 to 20:00 [19]. However, the vector was aggressive throughout the night and exhibited 2 peaks in the indoor biting activity at 20:00 to 22:00 and later at 02:00 to 06:00, with the peak outdoor biting activity at 18:00 to 22:00. The low parity rate of female mosquitoes in this area is likely to be related to the application of the insecticide K-Othrine (a water-based formulation of deltamethrin) during the period of the study in August 1999, as shown by the low parity rate that month (6.7%). Mixed feeding by mosquitoes is common, but with An. arabiensis this may be determined by the host available [21]. In this area, the presence of domestic animals is most likely to be very rare in human dwellings. Therefore, the human biting index recorded (78.7%) was relatively high, similar to that in Gedaref state [8]. Although there is seldom a large difference in susceptibility between the sexes, female mosquitoes (preferably blood-fed) should be used exclusively in field tests. This is because they survive better and show lower control mortality [15]. The susceptibility to DDT, malathion and fenitrothion was found to be 97.8%, 96.3% and 100.0% respectively, indicating that the mosquito population in this area had a low level of resistance to insecticides. Similar findings were reported in central Ethiopia [19]. The comeback susceptibility of An. arabiensis to DDT may be due to stoppage of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides for more than 20 years. Nevertheless, in the Gezira irrigated scheme the vector developed resistance to several insecticides in the 1970s, which was influenced by the overuse of crop-spraying with insecticides [10]. It is important to note that the establishment of the New Halfa agricultural scheme in the area has resulted in a serious abundance of An. arabiensis throughout the year. More studies are needed in order to assess the role of this species in malaria transmission in different seasons. References 1. WHO expert committee on malaria, 20th report. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2000 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 892). 2. Colling FH, Bsansky NGJ. Vector biology and the control of malaria in Africa. Science, 1994, 264:1874–5. 3. El Gaddal AA. The experience of the Blue Nile Health Project in the control of malaria and other water associated diseases. In: American Association for Advancement of Science. Malaria and development in Africa. A cross-sectoral approach. Washington DC, AAAS, 1991 (http://www.aaas.org/international/africa/malaria91/index.html). 4. A global strategy for malaria control. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1993, 71:281–4. 5. Petrarca V et al. Cytogenetics of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Sudan, with special reference to An. arabiensis: relationships with East and West Africa populations. Medical and veterinary entomology, 2000, 14:149–64. 6. Dukeen MY, Omer SM. Ecology of the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis Patton (Diptera: Culicidae) by the Nile in northern Sudan. Bulletin of entomological research, 1986, 76:451–67. 7. El Sayed BB et al. Study of the urban malaria transmission problem in Khartoum. Acta tropica, 2000, 75:163–71. 8. Hamad AA et al. Marked seasonality of malaria transmission in two rural sites in eastern Sudan. Acta tropica, 2002, 83: 71–82. 9. Abdelrahman AA. The integrated pest management strategy and its expected environmental and economical impact in Sudan. Albuhuth, 1994, 4(1–B):164–75. 10. Haridi AM. Inheritance of DDT resistance in species A and B of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1972, 47:619–26. 11. Adam I et al. In Sudan chloroquine resistance is worsening and quinine resistance is emerging. Sudan medical journal, 2001, 39:5–11. 12. Gillies MT. The duration of the gono-trophic cycle in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus, with a note on the efficiency of hand catching. East African medical journal, 1952, 30:129–35. 13. Verron A. Outline of the determination of malaria mosquito in Ethiopia. Part I: adult female anopheline. Mosquito news, 1962, 22:37–49. 14. Verron A. Outline of the determination of malaria mosquito in Ethiopia. Part II: anopheline larvae. Mosquito news, 1962, 22:394–401. 15. Annex of 22nd report of the WHO Expert Committee on Insecticide-Resistance of Vectors and Reservoirs of Diseases. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1976 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 585). 16. El Gaddal AA et al. Malaria control in the Gezira–Managil Irrigated Scheme of the Sudan. Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 1985, 88:153–9. 17. Molineaux L et al. The epidemiology of malaria and its measurement. In: Wernsdorfer WH, McGregor I, eds. Malaria: principles and practice of malariology. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1988:999–1090. 18. Crees MJ. Biting activity of mosquitoes and malaria incidence in the southeast lowveld of Zimbabwe. Transactions of the Zimbabwe Scientific Association, 1996, 70:21–7. 19. Abose T et al. Re-orientation and definition of the role of malaria vector control in Ethiopia. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1998 (WHO/MAL /98.1085). 20. Gillies MT. Anopheline mosquitoes: vector behaviour and bionomic. In: Wernsdorfer WH, McGregor I, eds. Malaria: principles and practice of malariology. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1988:453–86.
|